Showing posts with label Caribbean Masculinity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Caribbean Masculinity. Show all posts

October 18, 2012

Jamaican Gentlemen @ The Good Men Project


For a revolutionary generation of young Jamaican men, the strong and available role models looked like the enemy.

I count myself among the fortunate to have known a few people who have been my Morning Stars or heroes: Dennis Scott, friend and mentor; Melvyn Smith, family friend and supervisor, and James Carnegie, teacher and scholar.
These three men personified what it meant to be, as Mr. Carnegie often reminded me at Jamaica College, a “Jamaican gentleman.” That phrase stuck with me. As someone who came of age in post-Independence Jamaica, I grew up in revolutionary times in which the idea of resistance, especially to British colonialism, became my raison d’ĂȘtre.
Read more at http://goodmenproject.com/mentoring-and-volunteering/the-good-life-jamaican-gentlemen/#TdEG6Ctfl64PeI8K.99 



Blog Disclosure Policy


Geoffrey Philp’s Blog Spot receives a percentage of the purchase price on anything you buy through links to Amazon, Shambala Books, Hay House, or any of the Google ads or Google Custom Search.


***

Disclaimer of Endorsement


The documents posted on this Web site may contain hypertext links or pointers to information created and maintained by other public and private organizations. These links and pointers are provided for visitors' convenience. I do not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of any linked information. Further, the inclusion of links or pointers to other Web sites or agencies is not intended to assign importance to those sites and the information contained therein, nor is it intended to endorse, recommend, or favor any views expressed, or commercial products or services offered on these outside sites, or the organizations sponsoring the sites, by trade name, trademark, manufacture, or otherwise.

Reference in this Web site to any specific commercial products, processes, or services, or the use of any trade, firm or corporation name is for the information and convenience of the site's visitors, and does not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by this blog.

July 19, 2012

Marcus Garvey's Doctrine of Success



Perhaps no other phrase sums up Marcus Garvey's philosophy as "The Doctrine of Success." In fact as Garvey stated in a speech in Halifax, Nova Scotia, in 1937,s "At my age I have learnt no better lesson than that which I am going to impart to you to make man what he ought to be—a success in life. There are two classes on men in the world, those who succeed and those who do not succeed" (Marcus Garvey: Life and Lessons, xxv). In his essay "Living for Something," Garvey gives practical advice on how to succeed.

Lesson 19

Living for Something

Life is an important function.  It was given for the purpose of expression.  The flower expresses itself through the beauty of its bloom.  The vine expresses itself through its rambling search in settling its own peculiar natur{e}.  The tree expresses itself in its smiling green leaves, shaking branches and sometimes hanging fruits.  The lark expresses itself in its laughter and song.

The river expresses itself in its gentle meandering unto the sea and man expresses himself according to the idealistic visions of his nature.  There is a scope for each life.  Let yours find its scope and fully express itself.

Man should have a purpose and that purpose he should always keep in view, with the hope of achieving it in the fullest satisfaction to himself.  Be not aimless, drifting and floating with the tide that doesn’t go your way.

To find your purpose, you must search yourself and with the knowledge of what is good and what is bad, select your course, steering toward the particular object of your dream or desire.

Never enter upon life’s serious journey without a programme.  Simpleton as you may be, you can have a programme.  No ship ever reaches port without a positive destination beforehand, otherwise it will drift on the mighty ocean to be overtaken by the storm or the ill wind that blows.

The sensible captain goes to sea with a chart to map out his course so as to reach his harbor of safety.  Your programme is your chart through life.  Everything you do, do it by method, nothing succeeds continuously or repeatedly by chance.  You may get success in a particular direction by accident, but it was chiefly because that accident was the correct method in achieving that particular thing, and you happened to have struck upon the right method by chance.  But trying chances that way a second time may bring you failure, as it generally does.

To follow the correct method will give you the same result all the time.  Therefore, make your life a methodical one.  Rise at a certain hour, work up to a certain hour, retire at a certain hour.  Do everything on time so that your entire system becomes methodical.  If you have something to do, and it ought to be done, do it with proper method or system to get the best result.  Study it first, then go after doing it.

If a thing is worth while doing, it is worth while doing well.

How pitiful it is to see a man living without a programme without knowing how he is going to use his todays and his tomorrows.  If you follow him long enough you will find him going down the ditch of failure, because he has been travelling without a programme.

Observe the other man who has his programme, and see him go from one step to the next with success.  If you have a programme, you know what comes next.  If you have none, you have to improvise one and then it is too late to do it properly, and so you fail.

If you want to be 5,000 miles away in December and it costs $500.00, because you may be disappointed at the last mo{m}e{n}t{, s}tart from January thinking about your trip and making arrangements for it, so that when the time comes you will be perfectly ready.  Make this a practice in everything, don’t wait until time arrives, think ahead.

Always try to look through by calling upon your experience when you are looking to that future that is ahead of you.  Analyse it, arrange it to suit your needs, so that when things come upon you, you will be ready.  Don’t let things come upon you suddenly.

The man who lives in the present, preparing for the future {,} always enjoys a better future that the man who doesn’t visualize it, but who goes right into it unprepared.  Future seeing is a worthy object.

Always try to look down the future.  You make slight mistakes here and there but if you gauge it properly, with the experience of the past and the conditions of the present, you may strike an even or accurate estimate of what it ought to be, so when it comes, you will be able to welcome it with some kind of satisfaction.

To life for something doesn’t only mean something for yourself, but something for your kith and kin and something for your race.  If a father lives for something, he ought to be able to see his children through that something, so that what he does not accomplish for himself might be accomplished for his children.  As for instance, an industrious father lives with the hope of improving his social condition and economic condition.  He would like to live in a beautiful mansion on the hill, from which he could see the country places around, the valleys, the dales and the lofty mountains, but he is working in the valley, living in a small cottage{.}  He is growing older without his dreams realized, but he looks to his son and says “if I cannot enjoy this desire of mine, because I may be too old, when the times comes, I shall make it possible for my son to live on that hilltop or mygrandson{.”  T}hat is living in the future.  That is living for something, because when the old man dies, the son inherits and when the son dies, the grandson inherits.  Inherits what?  That which the grandfather lived for.

This should be the policy of every Negro, to live for something to hand down to a son, to a grandson, that they may have life a little easier than their fathers before them.  This is the way successful and great families have come into the world and great races too.

No Negro should be objectless or purposeless in life.  Always have a purpose.  To waste time in non-essentials is to be purposeless.  Playing bone dice is purposeless.  There is nothing achieved in the time wasted in doing it.  No great fortune is guaranteed, no great are it accomplished, no structure is built because it is a game of chance.  Playing pool is a waste, because like playing the dice it is a game of chance.  Sitting around and going from place to place without an occupation is waste, valuable time is going and nothing is being registered by way of achievement; but when one settles down upon a given and worthy idea or occupation, such as in architect, an engineer, a builder, a farmer, a poet, a teacher, he or she is working on something that may become tangible in results.  It is from such tangible assets that we build fortunes.  Find something tangible to do, then, and use your time in doing it well.  It is better that you be dead than having no purpose in life.

Ella Wheeler Wilcox says:--

Have a purpose, and that purpose keep in view,
Have a purpose, and that purpose keep in view,
For drifting like a helmless vessel,
Thou can’st ne’er to self be true.

The ship without a helm must flounder on the rock.  Why be such a ship?  Why not sail through life like the barque whose helm is perfect?  Be a captain with chart in hand seeing his port as he sails steadily on.  See your port, visualize it, and as the time comes, anchor it.





From  The Course of African Philosophy, ed . Tony Martin. Dover: Majority Press, 1986


***




Exonerate Marcus Garvey

To be delivered to President Barack Obama

May 2, 2012

Fatherhood in Caribbean Fiction




Figuring the Father in Contemporary Caribbean Fiction
by 
Jennifer Rahim


The figure of the father has long troubled the Caribbean’s imagination. This unease is perhaps most demonstrated in the fact that, across the disciplines, fatherhood has often been represented in various states of absentia: not so much completely missing, as relegated to the margins of literary and cultural studies. The region’s matriarchal construction has generally been given more attention, and understandably so. Edith Clarke’s foundational  1957 study,  My Mother Who Fathered Me, evokes this well-circulated feature of the Caribbean’s social landscape. Clarke’s title alludes to George Lamming’s novel,  In the Castle of My Skin  (1953), where the protagonist G. praises the almost hermaphroditic heroism of his mother: “My father who had only fathered the idea of me left me the sole liability of my mother who really fathered me” (11). From the beginning of the 1990s, a new cadre of novels from the Anglophone Caribbean that gives prominence to fathers and fatherhood suggests this trend has shifted. Some of these include Shani Mootoo’s Cereus Blooms at Night and  Valmiki’s Daughter, Nalo Hopkinson’s  Brown Girl in the Ring  and  Midnight Robber, Lawrence Scott’s Night Calypso, Merle Hodge’s For the Life of Laetitia, Jamaica Kincaid’s Mr. Potter, Martin Mordecai’s Blue Mountain Trouble and Patricia Powell’s The Fullness of Everything. 












***



If you enjoyed this post, check out my page on Amazon. I’d also be very grateful if you’d help it spread by emailing it to a friend, or sharing it on Twitter or Facebook. Thank you!

September 22, 2011

Call for Papers: Special Issue of the Journal of West Indian Literature



Michael A. Bucknor (University of the West Indies-Mona) and Ian Bethell-Bennett (College of the Bahamas) extend an invitation to submit articles for a special issue of the Journal of West Indian Literature for publication in April 2012. The issue will focus on “Masculinities in Caribbean Literature and Culture.”  The date for submitting articles is October 31, 2011, but the co-editors encourage potential contributors to send work ahead of the deadline.

Description: In spite of the growing significance of issues of masculinities in gender and other interdisciplinary studies, publications on the role of masculinities in Caribbean culture have been modest in literary and cultural studies. Curdella Forbes points out that it was not until the appearance of works “such as Belinda Edmondson’s Making Men (1999)… that major discussions of the subject appeared” in Caribbean literary criticism (From Nation to Diaspora 2).  In Anglophone Caribbean cultural studies, it is primarily music that has attracted gendered analyses that focus on masculinities. While there have been some discussions linking masculinities and sexualities, masculinities and education, and masculinities and socialization, and there have been inter-disciplinary collections of essays that engage masculinities, the range of artistic modes that contribute to masculinities discourse is still to be explored.

This Special Issue of the Journal of West Indian Literature invites multiple readings of gender that underscore the role of masculinities in a range of literary and cultural expressions in the Caribbean.  Against the background of studies of the social construction, performance, interrogation and political posturing of hegemonic masculinities, we ask for explorations of some leading questions: Have the depictions of male characters changed over the last five decades or so from Naipaul, Lamming, and Lovelace to such contemporary writers as Junot DĂ­az, Kei Miller, Anton Nimblett, and what ideological agendas have been served by these depictions? Is there a relationship between migration/diaspora and revised Caribbean masculinities?  Of what significance is the geo-political world of the family, the community, work and leisure to the construction of Caribbean masculinities? To what extent has the role of the Caribbean male been altered by modernity and postmodernity, late-capitalism, late-postcolonialism, globalisation or neo-liberalism? These and similar questions are issues this JWIL publication endeavours to highlight.

Although JWIL is a literary journal, the editors encourage submissions from all areas of cultural production: literature, film, music, visual arts, theatre (including forms of popular culture) and any field of study that examines masculinities in Caribbean cultural and artistic expression.  They also strongly encourage the submission of comparative work between the Anglophone and other linguistic groups of the Caribbean or between different modes of cultural production.

The editors invite papers of 20 to 25 double-spaced typed pages in English and formatted to the MLA style guide. A copy of each paper should be sent by October 31, 2011, by e-mail, to one of the co-editors:

Dr. Ian Bethell-Bennett (School of English Studies, College of the Bahamas, Oakes Field, P. O. Box N 4912, Nassau, The Bahamas) at bethellbennett@gmail.com

Dr. Michael A. Bucknor (Department of Literatures in English, University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, Kingston 7, Jamaica) at michael.bucknor@uwimona.edu.jm

Painting from Ebony G. Patterson’s series “Faces from the Dancehall”

Via http://repeatingislands.com/2011/09/20/call-for-papers-special-issue-of-the-journal-of-west-indian-literature/

September 6, 2011

Marcus Garvey's Rehabilitation of Black Men. Part Two






In Chapter II of A Dialogue:  What’s The Difference? Garvey continues his thesis of mental emancipation through the conversation between the father and son. Garvey argues that the success of the race will occur "when the Negro recovers himself and starts to think independently and particularly in the direction of building for himself, even to the extent of creating his own improved civilization, he will find that there is absolutely no difference between him and the white man."



A Dialogue:  What’s The Difference?

By Marcus Garvey



Chapter II

Son:

I intend to ask your advice, father, on many things affecting my life, for I have come to realize that one profits very much by experience.  You have had more experience than I, therefore I ought to profit by what you honestly tell and teach me.



Father:

I see you are becoming very philosophic, my boy.

Son:

Yes, father, I also think that it is a good thing to start life with the right philosophy, and if I can get an honest introduction into the right philosophy my life will not be lived in vain.

Father:

I am indeed glad to hear of your decision.  I shall do everything to properly advise you, so that your mistakes in life, if any, may be reduced to a minimum, for it is the things we know not of that hurt us most; for the things we know can be properly measured, negotiated or handled from our best judgment, but when we are entirely ignorant we are at the mercy of that which is.

Son:

I quite appreciate that, and that is why I am so anxious to gather information from you to help me in my journey through life.  I am really desirous of knowing more about the contact between black and white; I want to find out if there is any positive and irremovable handicap that would prevent the blackman rising to the same eminence as the white man.

Father:

In my first conversation with you I hinted that there was absolutely no difference but that which is mental.  Mind is the thing that rules and the black man to-day falls below the level of a white man only because of the poverty of his mind.  He has somewhat subjugated his mind.  He has surrendered it to his environments – environments that have been created for him through an exterior civilization.  The white man’s civilization is an improvement upon other civilizations, and the Negro has been brought within its pale or under its influence and it has succeeded in humiliating and denying him all initiative, but when the Negro recovers himself and starts to think independently and particularly in the direction of building for himself, even to the extent of creating his own improved civilization, he will find that there is absolutely no difference between him and the white man.

Son:

Must I take it that the Negro will ultimately emancipate himself through the development of his own mind?

Father:

Yes, all emancipation is from within.  That is to say, real emancipation.  As a man thinketh so is he.  That means that the man must think for himself and make himself.  A race is only a congregation of individual men, so as a race thinketh so will it be.

Son:

You mean, therefore, that when the Negro race as a whole starts to think in the higher terms of life there will be a real racial emancipation?

Father:

That is so.  Unfortunately at the present time the Negro’s mind is confused.  In America, for instance, the American Negro wants one thing, in the West Indies the Negroes there want another thing, and in Africa the natives are quite different even in their separate and distinct tribal outlooks.  There is no unit of purpose, there is no common objective with Negroes as with the white man.  As for instance, the white man has a dominant idea of control. He feels he must govern, that no one is above him.  Such a feeling inspires him to its accomplishment and so he is a ruler everywhere you find him.  The Negro is not yet as bold as that to desire absolute control, he is satisfied to be subservient and so it becomes very easy to reduce him to the various conditions in which he finds himself to-day in America, the West Indies and Africa.  The white man is not afraid of responsibility, he is not afraid of any risk, he is adventurous, he is bold, he has daring in his blood.  It is this kind of character that gave us discoverers like Columbus, Raleigh, Drake and great conquerors like Napoleon, Nelson,  Wolfe, and warriors like Charlemagne, Attila and the Green {Greek} and Roman heroes.

Son:

You believe the, father, that the Negro has been too self-satisfied.

Father:

It is more than that, my son.  He has been too lazy and careless with his own life.  It is the duty of man not only to protect his own life but to protect the existence of his tribe, his clan or his race, and when it is considered that mankind has always been in universal warfare against each other, leading to tribe against tribe, clan against clan, race against race, nation against nation, it seems suicidal that any tribe, clan, race or nation should become indifferent to the activities of others to the extent of not preparing itself against invasion, attack or subjugation.  To do this you must know, you must understand, you must have good information of what others are doing, therefore you must be adventurous, you must go out to seek your information, you must take chances.  The Negro has not been doing this and so those who have indulged in this kind of adventure have surpassed him and have ultimately enslaved him.

Son:

So there is a great deal of work to be done in recovering ourselves.

Father:

My boy, we have not even started yet.  To-day we are hearing much of unemployment among the white races, of the lack of opportunities in industry and so forth.  That is true and that can be explained through the fact that the white man has been a builder for the last one thousand years at least; he has been building his kingdoms, his nations and his empires; he has been building his towns and his municipalities, he has been building his institutions and adding to the growth of his civilization.  He has almost reached the apex.  There is hardly much more for him to do in the realm of industry.  He is now occupied chiefly in the discovery of new things, elemental and scientific.  You can very well understand, therefore, that there isn’t very much for him to do, but the Negro who hasn’t built any nation, kingdom or empire, nor laid the foundation of his industrial and commercial marts is in a different position.  He has still to start where the white man started hundreds of years ago, so that if the Negro were conscious of himself he would not accept the conditions imposed upon him of being unemployed.  He would find much to do building for himself.

Son:

But where could he build, father?

Father:

He could build just where he is.  There are more than two hundred million Negroes in Africa with a continent that is large and resourceful.  Let him build there, let him build his own nations, let him build his own civilization, let him show the world a duplicate in Africa of what exist{s} in Europe.  The Negro in America has the opportunity of even building where he is if he will think seriously and lay down a proper programme.  He forms a part of the American nation.  He is socially ostracized.  Of the 48 States of the American Union he doesn’t boss or control one.  If the American people refuse to absorb the Negro on equal terms the Negroes could colonize themselves in America and particularly in certain sections of the South, and build themselves such a political, industrial and general economic power that they would be considered a real factor in American national life.  Fifteen million Negroes in a population of one hundred and twenty million people in the United States ought to be able to exercise a great influence upon American public opinion.  In the West Indies the Negroes form the majority population in each of the islands, yet these Negroes have very little influence and power.  If they were thinking right they could build up where they are a powerful political influence that would probably see them one day a free and independent people.

Son:

But would the white man tolerate such ideas and progress among Negroes, father?

Father:

My son, you must understand this.  It is not what the other fellow will give you –you must take; it is what you want that you must have.  The white man has no more right of interfering with the black man’s progress than the black man has to interfere with the white man.  Nature or God made black and white free human agents and as such they have a right to the possession of all that nature gives, and when one man interferes with the rights of another and that other submits, he is a coward, he is a fool, and God, nature and all men must be against him.

Son:

The theory then, father, is that the Negro should be self-reliant, self-expressive and self-willed.

Father:

Yes, this is not only a theory but it must be a practical fact.  The man who is dependent upon someone else to do something for him never gets anything done, and any black man who is foolish enough to think that somebody else is going to do something for him, thorough and complete, to his benefit, is but a fool.

Son:

How wonderful it must be, father, to have the ambition you have suggested.

Father:

Ambition, reasonable ambition, is the making of the man and the making of the race.  The individual or the nation that has no ambition has no true destiny.  It is a positive fact that the majority of Negroes to-day lack ambition.

Son:

But it must be aroused in them, father.

Father:

Yes, but it is a difficult task.  The average Negro has submitted for so long in slavery and in general serfdom to the dictates of the white man that he has almost lost hope and confidence in himself.  That is why in America it is hard to organize the Negro and still more so in the West Indies where they have no racial consciousness at all.  The American and West Indian Negroes were slaves for hundreds of years, and the subjugation of that period seems to have taken out of them all the old African courage and nobility; but scattered here and there among them you will find a few noble and courageous men and women who are doing everything possible to arouse these lethargic and almost unconscious people to a full realization of themselves.

Son:

Then there is great hope in that respect, father?

Father:

Yes, my son.  Nature has peculiar ways of speaking to her children in periods.  The cycle of things has brought about certain changes, and these changes must affect the Negro as everybody else; probably the white man more than anybody else is doing his best to organize the Negro to a consciousness of himself.  The burnings and lynchings in the Southern sections of the United States, the economic oppression in the West Indies, and the inhuman and brutal treatment of the nations of South Africa and in other parts of the continent, and their general exploitation tend to bring out among them a consciousness that probably would not have been evident under any other circumstance.  This may be God’s way of bringing the Negro out of his bondage.




***


[1] Hill, Robert, and Bair, Barbara. eds. Marcus Garvey Life and Lessons. Berkley: U California P, 1987.
"A Dialogue:  What’s The Difference?" is also from Marcus Garvey Life and Lessons.


***




Exonerate Marcus Garvey

To be delivered to President Barack Obama


August 29, 2011

Marcus Garvey's Rehabilitation of Black Men. Part One





One of the subtexts of The Philosophy and Opinions of Marcus Garvey is the rehabilitation of Black men. While some have accused Garvey of male chauvinism—apart from the historical context and the evidence of many female leaders in the UNIA —I can understand Garvey's intent.

As many writers such as Richard Wright and James Baldwin have demonstrated in their fiction, Black men have been the target of the White patriarchy whose goal has been to emasculate Back men both physically and spiritually. Marcus Garvey sought to put an end to that by inspiring Black men, who had drifted into learned helplessness, to recognize their inherent dignity.

Garvey did this in many ways. He wrote songs, authored plays, gave speeches and lauded titles such as "Supreme Potentate" and "Leader of the American Negroes," on the male members of the UNIA. As Sister Samaad explains, this had an immediate effect on the male members:

You would almost see them -- metamorph into something else. You would see it. They'd suddenly get very tall because the smallest man in the uniform still looked like a giant. I can tell you that from experience. They were gorgeous. The black men were gorgeous.

Another method that Garvey employed was an "experimentation with dialogues," which were probably modeled on the work of Goldsworthy Lowes Dickinson [1]. In A Dialogue: what's the Difference? the conversation between the father and son reveals the "Doctrine of Success" that Garvey sought to instill in Black men and, most importantly, in their sons.


A Dialogue:  What’s The Difference?
By Marcus Garvey


Chapter 1


Son:

Say, father, why is it I am born black and placed at such a disadvantage among other boys in the world?

Father:

My son, to be born black is no disgrace nor misfortune.  It is an honour.  Nature never intended humanity to be of one colour or complexion, and so there are different races or types of people in the world.  There are standard types and the Negro is one of them.  In the history of the world the Negro has had a glorious career.  In the centuries past he was greater than any other race, but, unfortunately, to-day he occupies a position not as favourable as that of his fathers.

Son:

But father, everywhere I go I hear and see people speaking and acting disrespectfully toward the Negro.

Father:

That is true, my son, but that doesn’t mean that to be black is to be really inferior.  It is only because the economic condition of the blackman is so low to-day why other peoples do not entirely respect him.  It is, therefore, due to his own neglect, and not to any cause of natural inferiority.

Son:

Does that mean, father, that if the Negro wants he can be as honourable, progressive and dignified as any other race?

Father:

Yes, my son, that’s it.  In this world we are what we make ourselves.  The Negro is just an individual like anyone else, and, individually, he can make himself what he wants to be.  In the same respect the individuals of a race becoming a congregation of a whole can make themselves what they want to be.
Son:

Do you mean by that, father, that if I want to be a great man I can be?

Father:

That’s just it, my son.  If in your mind you develop the thought and the ambition to be a useful and great man rather than a pervert, imbecile or hopeless dependent, you can be so, and in the same way you can do that as an individual; if the race become inspired it can climb to heights of greatness and nobility.

Son:

So, father, the only difference between me and the white boy is mind and ambition.

Father:

That is right, my son.  The white boy who has the ambition through dint of perserverence, energy and labour may climb from his lowly surroundings to become President of the United States or a Prime Minister in England.  The biographies and auto-biographies of individuals have shown that some of the humblest boys in the world became the world’s greatest men.

Son:

I am glad of this explanation, father, because at school and wherever I went I was made to feel that the Negro was never anybody and could never be anybody.

Father:

I can well understand that, my boy.  That is the kind of wicked influence that has been used against the race to deny it of its character for higher development.  But we must never fall entirely to our environment.  We must crate the environments we want, and I do hope you will endeavor all during your lifetime to create the environments you would like to live in.

Son:

But what about the millions of other Negroes, father, who do not know this?





Father:

The lack of this knowledge, my boy, is the great disadvantage of the race as a whole.  Most of our people born to modern environments in our civilization seem to think that they were destined to be an inferior people.  Their school and education was based upon this assumption.

Son:

But why so, father?

Father:

Because under our present civilization the Negro was forced to accept his educational code from other peoples who were not disposed to give him credit for anything.  They wrote books quite disparaging to the Negro.  Their literature was intended to bolster up their particular race and civilization and down that of the blackman.  Historians who have written have all twisted the history of the world so as to show the inferiority of the blacks.  The blackman has not written recently his own history, neither has he yet engaged himself in writing his own literature; and so, for the last hundred years, he has been learning out of the white man’s book, thereby developing the white man’s psychology.

Son:

I can see, father, that is why at school I wanted to be a white man, because the books I read all told me about the great deeds of white men.  I wanted to be like Abraham Lincoln and George Washington and Napoleon, but I thought I could only be that by being white.

Father:

This is a mistake, my boy.  Greatness has no colour.  You must never want to be a white man.   You must be satisfied to be what nature made you and to excel in that respect, so that the credit for your achievements will go to your race.

Son:

What a wonderful thing it would be, father, if all the Negroes thought this way.





Father:

That is it, my boy.  There is a new effort to inspire all the blacks to think this way, so that in another hundred years our children will not want to be white but will be proud to be black.  Instead of wanting to be George Washington and Abraham Lincoln or a Disraeli or Lord Chatham you should try to be a Toussant L’Overture {Toussaint L’Ouverture}, a Hannibal, a Booker T. Washington.

Son:

These were all black men father?

Father:

Yes, my son.  Hannibal, the Carthagenian, was a blackman, but the white history will tell you he was white.  Toussant L’Overture, the slave of Santa Domingo, was also a blackman, and if it were not for men like Rendell {Wendell} Phillips probably the records would show in another hundred years that he was white.  Even up to now some people are trying to make out that Booker T. Washington was more white than he was Negro.  That shows how certain white historians and others are disposed to rob the Negro of any glory that he may have.

Son:

So all the books we read, father, are not true?

Father:

That’s right, my boy.  Most of the books that are written are for propaganda purposes.  Each nation has its own propaganda method.  The Anglo-Saxon race will boot the Anglo-Saxon, the Teutonic race will boost the Teutons, the Latin races will boost the Latins.  None is impartial enough to give real credit to other peoples for what they have done are accomplishing, so that the books that the Negro has been reading written by the Anglo-Saxon, Teutonic and Latin races were not intended for him at all, except to give him the idea that in the history of the world he was never anybody.  The time will come when our historians and writers will reveal the truths of history.  At that time we will learn that our race was once the greatest race in the world.  That, when we had a glorious civilization on the banks of the Nile in Africa the white races were living in caves and among the trees and bushes of Europe.  They were savages and barbarians when our fathers held up the torch of civilization in Africa.

Son:

So there is no need, father, for me to hold down my head any longer?
Father:

No, my son, you should hold up your head and be as proud as any other boy in the world.  The English boy wants to be Prime Minister of England, the French boy wants to be President of France, the American white boy wants to be President of the United States.  You, my boy, and all other black boys should have a similar ambition for a country of your own.

Son:

Is that the reason why, father, the Japanese refuse to accept the leadership of Western civilization?

Father:

That is so.  The Japanese are a proud people.  They are of the yellow race and they feel that they should develop a civilization of their own, and so they have their own Empire, their own Prime Minister, their own Ambassadors, their own Army and Navy.  They have a Japanese Empire.

Son:

But can the Negro have an Empire, father?

Father:

Yes, my son.  It is difficult, to-day, for him to have a political Empire, because the world is almost taken up by the white and yellow races.  In fact, the white races have robed the homelands of the blacks, particularly in Africa.  The English, the French, the Italians, the Spaniards, the Belgians, and the Portuguese have, within one hundred years, gone from Europe into Africa, and have robbed every square inch of land from our fathers; so it is very difficult under existing conditions, where these countries use brute force to conduct their Government, for the Negro to politically become an imperial force.  But, culturally, the Negro can become imperial.  That is to say he can have an imperial ideal and culture and fellowship of love, which may ultimately end in political imperialism.

Son:

But how can this be possible, father?




Father:

You see, my boy, the world undergoes changes time over and again.  Just as the Negro ruled once and lost his power, so some of the races that are ruling now will in the cycle of things lose their power.  Nature intended this.  When this happens unfortunate and oppressed peoples rise into power, so that there is great hope for the Negro to be restored to his true political position, because sooner or later some of these dominant nations and races will fall.

Son:

So there is great hope for us politically, father?

Father:

Sure, my son.  But whatever hope we may have must be backed up by our own effort and energy.  We must never go to sleep.  We must always keep before us steadfastly the object we desire.  Like the Jews, we should never lose our purpose.  The Jews have been very much outraged by other nations and races of the world, but they ever clung to their religious ideals.  The Negro must have a religion that is binding.  He must have some ideal that is unchangeable and outstanding and when this ideal is universalized, being meritorious and worthy, he will in time accomplish the end.

Son:

I am glad father that there is a real  hope.  I shall tell all the other boys about this and shall make myself a missionary to preach the eternal hope of racial salvation.

Father:

That’s right, my boy, be ever vigilant in the maintenance of the honour, dignity and integrity of your race.









[1] Hill, Robert, and Bair, Barbara. eds. Marcus Garvey Life and Lessons. Berkley: U California P, 1987.
"A Dialogue:  What’s The Difference?" is also from Marcus Garvey Life and Lessons.




***

“We are petitioning President Barack Obama to issue to clear the name of Marcus Mosiah Garvey, a national hero of Jamaica.”